Well, the hardest–most counter-intuitive thing to GROK @F-L-O-W is the idea…
That there IS no composite standard for anyone to adhere too…excepting those which–are by default–accepted upon joining or being a part of any group.
“…the education and management of his character is the most important…”
This might be important to some but can’t be foist upon anyone because people are wired differently.
Until we get to the point where we can understand that people are motivated to different aspirants, the “strong” will continue to direct the weak.
Imagine this…some people maybe motivated to avoid “the above” or even “to be lazy….”
Now you can see why it’s difficult to apply a composite standard, and have it be “fair” to those who are motivated in an opposite direction–thus breaking down the libertarian model.
What about people who don’t want to work, learn, grow, or ANYTHING which we ascribe to be productive?
Should there be a minimum standard applied? Should people be forced against their “will” to be “normal?”
Hard questions when it comes to designing a “good society.”