“I just received the following note from one of our Inner Circle members. Below the note is my response.”
A thought, observation, way of looking at the list below…
AN-BEIGE – Survival
BO-PURPLE – Kinship
CP-RED – Power
DQ-BLUE – Avoidance
ER-ORANGE – Achievement
FS-GREEN – Affiliation
GT-YELLOW – ?
One stage’s end, is the next one’s means. At BEIGE, the end is survival. For PURPLE, the end is kinship, the means is survival. And so on through the list. It’s an interesting exercise.
If the means of YELLOW is affiliation, what’s the end? I think you’ve proposed contribution? Affiliation as a means to contribution. That could be seen as grouping in a manner that’s contributory to the larger whole. Or something.
Food for thought.
Yes, I’ll plug that in;)
The thing is you have to be clear on what system of emergence you’re using because it works for SGD but not VD, as all the systems are present in each of us…around 40320 permutations with 8…but if you use density and frequency even with 3 states x 8 = 24! u end up with probability numbers that are off the charts… and can explain their being such small differences in large numbers although that quite possibly only 18! Active
A person is a composite of the system while having up to maybe 3 core systems reaching some dominance across domains…
Who was that trans personal psychology guy? Parent, Child…Adult type of system..?