I feel this is where RO is weak.
the company’s needs come first and then you optimize for the employee.
While it’s clear the structure of work must be designed to get results, there is a lot of flexibility that RO doesn’t have because it ignores personality/talent/attitude, etc.
Take a look at the 1981 summary from Graves, look particularly at A’N’ (yellow) and see what he says about organizational use of human resources (my words)…
I’ll attach it also in another thread because I promised Mark I would send it to confirm my A = need, and N = neurobiology “lesson” hehe.
The interesting idea about Bennis quote was the introduction of “implicit” genetic factors and leadership has railed at this during the rein of ER-ORANGE and particularly now with FS-GREEN.
This is also the reason why I am “sensitive” (if that’s possible;) to the radical construction ideas where they do NOT explicitly state anything about the subconscious, rather than making assumptions without noting the implicit ground of BS that we live within, both in science and religion (ER and DQ)…
So, my delusions come from the “ground” of BS and not the ground of other things (@F-L-O-W) being one.
If someone doesn’t state that things are largely sub, or nonconscious, then the assumption is implicit @BS, that people can do this stuff with consciousness because anyone can be, do, have, become or contribute anything.
At least I got that bug out of my head, hehe.