Categories
2016 August

Just an aside on asymmetry

I forgot who was discussing the idea that until we had “some” people get rich enough to rise from “survivalism” or AN-BEIGE, we didn’t get “periods” of enlightenment.

I was triggered to write/remember by seeing the Cambodian Temples where the “gods” live, realizing the 81 hectare compound was built from “slave” labor much like all the great wonders…I think even figuratively the Empire State Building which was a marvel of construction and is a testimony of what “business/people” can do.

So back to the premise of asymmetry, RATHER THAN equality or for that matter INEQUALITY…in order for humanity sans you and me to evolve, asymmetries must be guarded.

The question is to what end and in what ways!

mike

Categories
2016 August

Olympics?

Anyone watching?

Brazil is an amazing country and wonderful example of all of the BRICS, and how cultural evolution–done too quickly–can lack the density and frequency required to hold under load.

I was watching the cycling (150 miles!) race and thinking about all the natural resources in Brazil with almost 9 million sqm and 200 million people with almost every sqm bathed in tropical weather!

Yet underneath it’s collapsing on itself. I heard it took until 2007 for Canada to pay off the 1976 olympics and it will require decades for Brazil to recover their investment in the “games” imagine that with everything else going on!

Here is something, perhaps I alone believe…that in strife, a culture regresses back to the density and frequency that will support the load, which is normally cascading the system into an overshoot position.

I’m still convinced we must regress ourselves back to (circling back) law and order and increase the density and frequency of DQ-BLUE before its challenges and we overshoot past DQ-BLUE into opportunism.

Let me show you an example:

(BARANGUY = Town or Municipal)

You Know Last Friday Have A Woman Shoot Out And Died Here In My Place But No People Seen That Crime Only Hear The Gun Sound

All Place In Cavite Have A Curfew. But Still Have A People Not Scared To Do Crime Or Stealling Here In Cavite

Yes But Here In My Place You Can’t Believe Barangay Here Was Scared To Walking Or Finding Whose People Doing That Crime. And Sometimes Barangay Will Resign Cos Of Scared To Going Dead That Cos Barangay Here Not So Much They Will Count It By Hand

Elected officials even with the right to govern, can’t govern because the social fabric is not strong enough–which is why you get a Duterte elected, but he’s not able to command (govern) because there are too many small towns that can’t get help from criminals who control the night!

The conversation came up because a roof was partially destroyed by people running across the roofs at night terrorizing people…and of course leaving them wet and cold as a result of rain.

While you think this can’t happen to us, it can and is in more parts of the USA than one can think!

We really on the social fabric to support the weight of law and order, rather than the presence of law and order as a protective system which is relied on to keep the regression from becoming widespread, but it can’t.

We have such conventional opportunities to change things right now from progression that assumes “everyone will and wants” to behave–ignoring the pugnacity of man…this ties back into why FS-GREEN as a short system, because the assumption is that people are rational behavers…!

I proposed a plan I labeled as “intoracy” more than a decade ago which stratified the amount of law order across the system from FORCE to SUPPORT based on the conditions, all driven from a system that provides training in 8 levels of behavior required for the conditions, I called this a “civilary” which could solve the problem with youth unemployment because they could be deployed in large numbers once entering the training through levels.

The elite could fund this program rather than giving everyone free college:(

This scaffolding could produce the “patches” we need to apply to upgrade the social fabric.

The question in my mind is we can’t trust our government to implement this symmetrically asymmetrical;)

mike

Categories
2016 August

Bookmarking the times…

Since no one responded, I’m free to continue my pontification.

In the archives of this list, I’ve spoken a lot about why coming nodal green has triggered the exit from FS-GREEN. I remember Graves either saying or writing that “FS” would be the shortest duration system.

The general oversimplified way that the system unfolds (read either the 1974 Futurist Article, or 1981 summary);

A system coalesces density and frequency as it enters, becomes stable (durable = dense and frequent) and nodal, then-because it satisfies very specific problems, remains active as the problems of the solution actually open the door to evolution of a new system which solves more problems than it creates (when the system starts creating more problems than it solves, this is the sign of evolution and a new system is coming).

Now, the difference between the Jay Approach and the Beck approach has to do with individual motives being present and durable (genetically hard wired) which cause each of us to prefer behavior influenced by values in a particular system where the core is:

Pre-individual (AN-BEIGE, BO-Purple)

CP-RED

DQ-BLUE

ER-ORANGE

FS-GREEN

*Post-Individual (GT-YELLOW, HU-TURQUOISE)

*in large part you can dismiss most of the post-individual behavior for individuals because as of now, few (1%) have that potential (1.5 million? = 1% X 1.5 billion in the developed world), and that number, although high would be discounted because the majority have no interest in the collective.

——

Ok with those basics in place, at least for me, I want to explain simple why FS-GREEN is now creating more problems than it solves.

Example:

Obamacare:

They were in such a big (political hurry) to solve it they didn’t run a systems dynamic model to realize that although 80% of the poor signed up, only 40% (high) of the middle class bought in and so while they claim that most are insured, it’s not the case that the largest group of healthy people are “misrepresented” in the payor pool.

The entire system will collapse with a few years as prices for healthcare must be borne by fewer and fewer healthy payors. Even though the healthy non-enrolled are fined, it’s not enough to make up for the gaps created–more problems created than solved!

I named this entire metasystem as EMERGENICS more than a decade ago and have used it to help me understand when the door of evolution is opening;)

Here is the ESSENTIAL FS-GREEN ERROR:

Projection of their thoughts and feelings onto and into a basin of thinking that doesn’t mirror their core values.

For instance.

FS-GREEN behaviors threaten to ostracize you from “a ceptance” if you are not PC. Since FS-GREEN is in “power”–that which is conferred on the majority rather than indigent in values–you not being PC can take away all of the benefits you have if you’re singled out.

The mistake that you can see FS-GREEN making is scattered all over the world (as this is a globalist meme by classification…interestingly enough because it actually serves power, avoidance, and achievement so well!)…and that is to project itself and its values into areas where memetic evolution has not yet prepared the soil for FS-GREEN.

The Middle East won’t buy our PC, and can’t, most of Asia straps it on like a belt to be pulled in or let out but not to become part of the Green wardrobe!

Russia, while have deep values associated with quality of life emergent from an early green costume of Faux-Green scoffs at the nature of those pretending FS-GREEN holds their answers, and because of this we have actually LOST an opportunity to become allies with the Russians! So much for Resets!

The FS-GREEN is reminiscent of the meta problem in values and that is, individuals do not change their core values over time, but will morph them to become more fit in the memescape.

So our memescape is going to continue to evoke, our core values are NOT going to be left behind, only sophisticated in mostly lateral and some oblique complexity, while we continue to create more and more complex problems that can only be solved in pieces–that’s right, fractionalization!

Zika won’t be the only thing athletes take from RIO! A strain of SUPERBUGS is swimming around in the competitive waters that emerged from hospital waste being dumped into the water allowing “antibiotic-resistant” bacteria to emerge.

Everyone knows that “slick green” paid 400 million in ransom to those smart mulas, and the kidnapping of American Citizens will increase dramatically in the future as a result, just hide and watch.

So while all these PC-politically expedient solutions continue to feed into the problem stream, you can expect solution-resistant problems (SRP) to grow with density and frequency, as a contingency.

Now all memetic basins generate their own shares of SRPs but each unfolding of the new basin generates more complex problems!

The misunderstanding by most is to assume that each new emergence of a values basin solves anything other than yesterday’s problems! While bringing about tomorrow’s “complex” problems.

I’ve said for years we have to slow this down or we wil find ourselves in problems too big to solve, only creating the conditions where the problems will solve us!

You really have to be careful what you wish for…the problems that solve us, are emerging now with peak FS-GREEN.

Watch! (But hide;)

mike